This case is not about money in politics as its detractors claim. It’s about whether or not the Federal Government can ban free speech based on the identify of the speaker.
We need a Justice who believes that the law means what it says and should be applied as such, regardless of his or her personal beliefs.
A representative of the Senate could verbally advise the President that they are not going to consent to his nominee and by doing so, they have fulfilled their Constitutional obligation. The Senate already did their job.
In the latest example of legal idiocy, legal challenges to Ted Cruz’s eligibility to be President of the United States continue to move forward towards the nation’s highest court.
NASHVILLE , Tenn. (Apr. 7, 2016) Today, the state Senate gave final approval to a bill setting the foundation to stop enforcement of gun control imposed by international law or treaty. The vote was 26-0.
How a media outlet presents a story is a simple measure that can help determine how objective or biased that organization is. In short, Fox presents the story as being about the court case, whereas CNN presents it as being about conservatives. One is about the actual story, the other is about politics.